Why Hasn’t the GOP Yet Walked the Walk on Its Mayorkas Impeachment Talk?

By James Varney for RealClearInvestigations

It’s nearly an understatement to say that Republican candidates campaigned hawkishly on border management within the runup to the 2022 midterms: As they decried the circulate of unlawful immigrants and medicines from Mexico, many vowed to question the person they largely blamed for the mess, Homeland Safety Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. 

Republicans have continued hammering Mayorkas since taking management of the Home. Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, who known as the flooding of greater than 5 million unlawful immigrants throughout the southern border since President Biden took workplace an “intentional” policy, has made a number of visits to the U.S.-Mexico border with different Republicans, and the Home has held a number of hearings on immigration. 

RELATED: Mayorkas Supports ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban But Can’t Define ‘Assault Weapons’

However as winter has turned to spring, the GOP has taken little motion to take away Mayorkas. Republicans Andy Biggs of Arizona and Pat Fallon of Texas  have every filed payments, however the Home Judiciary Committee, from which any impeachment transfer should come, has not taken up both decision. 

Conservative teams centered on the southern border advised RealClearInvestigations that impeachment didn’t come up throughout current conferences in Washington. 

“I simply got here from the Hill and a bunch of conferences with staffers they usually’re reporting the identical factor; one mentioned the convention is cut up, with numerous GOP ‘George W. Bush varieties’ who love a budget labor for American business and agriculture,” mentioned Todd Bensman of the conservative Middle for Immigration Research and writer of “Overrun: How Joe Biden Unleashed the Biggest Border Disaster in U.S. Historical past.”  

Bensman calls it an “previous story,” however low cost labor is simply a part of it. Republicans aren’t united on this subject as a result of some concern that following via on impeachment speak will alienate the average swing voters that the GOP wants to stay in command of the Home.

Even Republicans who’ve publicly attacked Mayorkas are actually reticent about discussing impeachment. RCI reached out to 16 GOP Home members for remark. Neither Biggs nor Fallon responded. Virginia Rep. Bob Good, a member of the Freedom Caucus who’s co-sponsor of each resolutions, declined to touch upon the file. Different outspoken administration critics akin to Dan Crenshaw of Texas, Tom McClintock of California, and Matt Gaetz of Florida didn’t reply. 

Solely two of the 16 Republican Home members agreed to talk on the file.

“I’ve repeatedly known as for his impeachment and am assured that Chairman Jordan will maintain true to his phrase of impeaching Mayorkas for overseeing an unprecedented surge of criminal activity at our southern border,” Rep. Paul Gosar of Arizona mentioned.  

RELATED: Cruz to Mayorkas: ‘If You Had Integrity, You Would Resign’

Rep. Scott Perry of Pennsylvania mentioned Biden administration officers have lied about what they’ve completed on the border however was extra circumspect on impeachment, suggesting a wait-and-see angle could also be behind the aggressive rhetoric. 

“I’m not on the Judiciary Committee and it must come from there,” he mentioned. “My hope is that at the least some data will come from hearings as a result of some members legitimately have some questions.” 

Perry and others mentioned they wish to see the Judiciary Committee make the case for impeachment, a course of Jordan seems to be favoring. For the second, nevertheless, the one concrete step Republicans have taken is a symbolic gesture by Rep. Chip Roy of Texas to attempt to lower Mayorkas’ wage from the DHS finances. 

The payments filed by Reps. Biggs and Fallon contend that Mayorkas’s conduct meets the constitutional threshold for impeachment, “excessive crimes and misdemeanors.” Fallon’s invoice, H. Res. 8, alleges that the secretary has violated the oath all cupboard members take to “faithfully uphold” the legal guidelines of america by failing to implement: 

• The Safe the Fence Act of 2006 that requires the DHS secretary to “keep operational management over your complete worldwide land and maritime borders of america.”
• The Immigration and Nationality Act that requires the DHS secretary to “detain inadmissible aliens arriving in america or aliens who’re current in america with out inspection till processed.” As an alternative, it claims, Mayorkas’ “catch and launch” strategy has allowed greater than “1,000,000 unlawful aliens” into the nation. 

Whereas referencing these two legal guidelines, the Biggs decision, H. Res. 582, additionally accuses Mayorkas of violating the Public Well being Providers Act by failing to guard U.S. residents from “threat and publicity to and contracting Covid-19 by refusing to take crucial steps to stop contagious unlawful aliens from getting into america.”  

In sum, the Biggs decision concludes Mayorkas needs to be impeached as a result of “his actions have subverted the desire of Congress and the core tenets of the Structure.” 
RCI reached out repeatedly to a dozen Democratic members of the Home Judiciary Committee searching for touch upon a doable impeachment of Mayorkas and their response. None of them responded.

RELATED: Mayorkas Falsely Claimed Border is ‘Closed’ Ahead of Biden Trip to El Paso

Mayorkas has acknowledged repeatedly he has no intention of resigning, a suggestion Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas made once more Tuesday when Mayorkas appeared at a Senate committee listening to. “When you had any integrity you’d resign,” Cruz mentioned.

The volley got here after the 2 acquired right into a verbal spat over how truthful the administration has been concerning the border. Cruz cited feedback by White Home Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre that persons are “not strolling throughout the border” together with pictures of individuals doing simply that. “You declare you care, Mr. Secretary –– that may be a lie,” Cruz mentioned. 

Cruz once more accused Mayorkas of dissembling after the DHS chief wouldn’t reply a query about whether or not Jean-Pierre lied. Mayorkas known as Cruz’s accusation “revolting.”

Nonetheless, the division is bracing for a doable impeachment and taking steps for Mayorkas’ protection. A authorities contract was signed with the legislation agency Debevoise & Plimpton to offer authorized help to the secretary; that contract would kick in provided that the Judiciary Committee moved an impeachment movement to the Home flooring.

Debevoise & Plimpton didn’t reply to a request for remark concerning the association. Biden administration officers accustomed to it mentioned it was crucial as a result of the impeachment of a cupboard secretary is so uncommon none of its authorized workers has any related expertise. 

The phrases of the contract weren’t disclosed, though officers pointed to examples up to now the place Home Republicans employed exterior authorized counsel to help it on laws that proved legally fraught.

A DHS spokesperson mentioned the contract was essential to “make sure the Division’s important mission shouldn’t be interrupted by the unprecedented, unjustified and partisan impeachment efforts of some members of Congress, who’ve already taken steps to provoke proceedings.”

Historical past exhibits the Home can transfer swiftly on impeachment if members select to. The Democratic majority, together with a handful of Republicans, voted to question departing President Trump only one week after the post-election riot on the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.  

RELATED: New U.S. Border Data: 284 Suspected Terrorists Apprehended So Far in Fiscal 2023

Defenders of the federal government’s present border insurance policies say that the conservatives’ argument is flawed. The Biden administration’s strategy is mainly a leisure of the Trump administration’s extra stringent technique. As such, they quantity to coverage variations between the 2 main political events and fall far in need of any “crimes and misdemeanors” that may justify impeachment.  

However, as RCI has previously reported, President Biden’s insurance policies have marked a pointy break from his predecessor’s, since Biden’s first day in workplace, when he signed seven govt orders on immigration that, amongst different issues, suspended deportations. 

Hans von Spakovsky, a senior fellow on the conservative Heritage Basis who co-authored the February report, “The Case for Impeachment of Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas Secretary of Homeland Security,” defended the impeachment argument from liberals who deride it as purely political. 

“It inaccurately and incorrectly asserts that we’re complicated the necessities of the Immigration and Naturalization Act with the Trump administration insurance policies,” he mentioned. “Our evaluation is predicated not on disagreeing with the insurance policies carried out by Mayorkas, however along with his violation of federal immigration legislation.” 

“I believe we’ve got specified by our paper what we expect the idea is for impeachment,” von Spakovsky advised RCI. They embody the claims that Mayorkas:  

• “intentionally defied and contravened the legal guidelines he’s charged with faithfully executing.” 

• “repeatedly abused the authority of his workplace, together with by, amongst different conduct, engaging a flood of aliens to cross the U.S. southern border along with his insurance policies and Statements.” 

• “betrayed the belief of the individuals by mendacity to Congress and withholding data and deceptive the general public in an effort to cover and suppress the character and consequence of his abominable insurance policies.” 

Von Spakovsky added that “the misguided priorities of Mayorkas have resulted in an enormous backlog within the adjudication system that unfairly hurts the various 1000’s of U.S. residents and lawful candidates whose immigration issues are delayed many months.” 

RELATED: There Have Already Been 1.6 Million Known Illegal Border Crossings This Fiscal Year

Though von Spakovsky and others argue impeachment is warranted “according to U.S. historical past and constitutional traditions,” it could even be a extremely uncommon transfer. Just one cupboard member has ever been impeached, President Ulysses S. Grant’s Struggle Secretary William Belknap in 1876, however he resigned the identical day the Home voted unanimously in opposition to him.  

Legal professional Common Harry Daugherty in 1922 and Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon in 1932 additionally confronted doable impeachment proceedings by the Home, however the former resigned in 1924 and the latter left the cupboard and have become U.S. ambassador to England. 

Impeachment supporters additionally level to the hazards the Biden administration’s porous border have created. Along with the humanitarian problems with tons of of 1000’s of individuals migrating via Mexico to the U.S., and the cash they’ve paid to Mexican cartels to facilitate their passage, the southern border has grow to be the principle conduit for lethal illicit fentanyl.

Scott Perry mentioned his constituents wish to see the Republicans do greater than merely speak concerning the border disaster, although he famous that Mayorkas is the agent who carries out insurance policies set by President Biden. 

“It’s chaos down there with the fentanyl and the cartels making thousands and thousands of {dollars},” he mentioned. 

“Most of our constituents are distraught about that and wish it fastened, and lots of would really like accountability for the way it occurred. In the end, the president is accountable so why not impeach him?” 

However as to what would possibly really occur with Mayorkas, Perry acknowledged he wasn’t positive. 

“My sense is that with the Judicial Committee holding hearings we’re working towards these form of issues,” he mentioned. “That may go to the fact-finding we have to should persuade a few of our skeptical members.” 

Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.

The opinions expressed by contributors and/or content material companions are their very own and don’t essentially mirror the views of The Political Insider.